![]() ![]() Rob Gallerani of Vicarious Visions told Axios he is urging fans to “ do what they feel is right” when it comes to purchasing the remastered version of the fantasy cult-classic. Related: WoW Devs Have Done "Almost No Work" During Activision Blizzard Controversy Although the letter does not detail which allegations are true or false, it signifies a contemptuous work environment. Of course, knowing Blizzard, it's entirely likely that there'll be nothing about Diablo at Blizzcon at all.So far the company has denied allegations set forth in the lawsuit, claiming in a statement provided to Screen Rant that “ The picture the DFEH paints is not the Blizzard workplace of today.” Following denial of these claims to the public, nearly 1,000 Activision Blizzard employees signed an open letter expressed support for the DFEH's lawsuit. This would reinvigorate the Diablo 3 playerbase, save time and money on development compared to making the entire thing from scratch, and maybe give Blizzard a good proof-of-concept to go ahead and remake Diablo 1 as well, probably also as an expandalone. That said, I think if they were to consider making a Diablo 2 remake, it would be far more prudent to make it a full-priced Diablo 3 expandalone, maybe with a "new" old class reintroduced as well (probably Druid). ![]() ![]() A Diablo 1 remake could actually update how the game plays, what environments are used, and fix the story which has become a gargantuan mess at this point. Diablo 3 is already kind of a remake of Diablo 2 anyways (first and second Acts are almost identical in theme and setting, Act 3 of D3 is like portions of Act 5 of D2, D3's Act 4 is a mirror opposite of D2's Act 4). I really don't see the point in remaking Diablo 2 when 1.) Diablo 3 is already out and 2.) Diablo 1 is far more ripe for a remake. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |